Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Front Immunol ; 11: 606333, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33324422

RESUMO

Background: Granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD) is a rare, potentially severe pulmonary complication of common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID). Informative clinical trials and consensus on management are lacking. Aims: The European GLILD network (e-GLILDnet) aims to describe how GLILD is currently managed in clinical practice and to determine the main uncertainties and unmet needs regarding diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Methods: The e-GLILDnet collaborators developed and conducted an online survey facilitated by the European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) between February-April 2020. Results were analyzed using SPSS. Results: One hundred and sixty-one responses from adult and pediatric pulmonologists and immunologists from 47 countries were analyzed. Respondents treated a median of 27 (interquartile range, IQR 82-maximum 500) CVID patients, of which a median of 5 (IQR 8-max 200) had GLILD. Most respondents experienced difficulties in establishing the diagnosis of GLILD and only 31 (19%) had access to a standardized protocol. There was little uniformity in diagnostic or therapeutic interventions. Fewer than 40% of respondents saw a definite need for biopsy in all cases or performed bronchoalveolar lavage for diagnostics. Sixty-six percent used glucocorticosteroids for remission-induction and 47% for maintenance therapy; azathioprine, rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil were the most frequently prescribed steroid-sparing agents. Pulmonary function tests were the preferred modality for monitoring patients during follow-up. Conclusions: These data demonstrate an urgent need for clinical studies to provide more evidence for an international consensus regarding management of GLILD. These studies will need to address optimal procedures for definite diagnosis and a better understanding of the pathogenesis of GLILD in order to provide individualized treatment options. Non-availability of well-established standardized protocols risks endangering patients.


Assuntos
Alergia e Imunologia/tendências , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/tratamento farmacológico , Granuloma do Sistema Respiratório/tratamento farmacológico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/tratamento farmacológico , Pediatria/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Pneumologia/tendências , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/diagnóstico , Imunodeficiência de Variável Comum/imunologia , Europa (Continente) , Granuloma do Sistema Respiratório/diagnóstico , Granuloma do Sistema Respiratório/imunologia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Internet , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/diagnóstico , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/imunologia , Pediatras/tendências , Prognóstico , Pneumologistas/tendências , Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos
4.
Lung ; 196(4): 463-468, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29651598

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Geriatric assessment (GA) for older patients with lung cancer could provide insight into vulnerability, cognitive impairment, and risk of toxicity. Discontinuation and complications of intensive treatment could potentially be prevented in vulnerable and frail patients. This study aimed to evaluate current clinical practice of GA for older patients with lung cancer in the Netherlands and identify potential hurdles for implementation. METHODS: Pulmonologists and radiation oncologists participating in the NVALT25-ELDAPT trial completed an online questionnaire regarding current practice of GA, added value of GA for treatment decision-making and logistic barriers for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. RESULTS: 15 out of 17 centers responded. Three performed GA as standard procedure, three on indication, eight considered a frailty screening step before GA, and one did not perform GA. Suspicion of cognitive problems was mentioned most often as indication for GA and of added value for treatment decision-making, followed by older age, curative-intent treatment, and stage I-III lung cancer. Administered instruments for screening and extensive GA were diverse. Main barriers to implement GA in clinical practice were logistic problems (timescales and availability of trained personnel). CONCLUSION: The use of GA in clinical practice for patients with lung cancer varied widely across centers regarding instruments and domains. Physicians are uniform in their opinion about indications for GA and the added value for treatment decision-making. Research should focus on manageable instruments and important domains to assess for this heterogeneous group of older patients with lung cancer to optimize treatment selection. Trial registration The NVALT25-ELDAPT trial is registered under trial number NCT02284308. Details are available at http://www.eldapt.org (predominantly in Dutch).


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/diagnóstico , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/fisiopatologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/psicologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Feminino , Idoso Fragilizado , Fragilidade/fisiopatologia , Fragilidade/psicologia , Fragilidade/terapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Seleção de Pacientes , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Pneumologistas/tendências , Radio-Oncologistas/tendências , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...